哈哈哈，不用当搬运工了。罗杰回了邮件，这种方式,IOTA是不认可的。
Dear Dale
Sorry, no. IOTA credit would not be allowed. IOTA rules are very specific:
C.3.8 Contacts made by the applicant using a single remote receiving or transmitting site are accepted for credit if the remote site is land-based, contained within a 500 metre (547 yard) radius circle, not located more than 100 kilometres (62 statute miles) from the applicant’s location and is nominated as being in use on the applicant’s personal profile. The applicant and the remote site must both be located within the same DXCC entity. Use of more than one remote site or a network using multiple sites is not permitted for credit. Contacts between fully automated remotes at both or either end of a path will similarly not receive credit.
C.3.9 Contacts made with a station found to be remotely operated will count for IOTA credit if the station operator and the remote receiving or transmitting station are both located on one or a maximum two qualifying islands for the same IOTA group (i.e. neither is on the mainland) and the set-up of the remote station complies with the requirements of C.3.8.
In the case of BA7CK, the remote station would not be within 100 kilometres of the operator and the operator would be on the mainland, not in AS-143. So, for two reasons any operation by BA7CK would not count for IOTA. Also, if any remote operation did take place, we would, because of uncertainty of his location, have to reject all future contacts by BA7CK for AS-143. Sorry, this would disappoint a lot of IOTA guys.
Best regards
Roger, G3KMA
