论坛风格切换切换到宽版
  • 2933阅读
  • 3回复

DX相关话题推荐:cw-skimmer-a-monster-or-killer-tool [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线BA4RF
 
发帖
4101
只看楼主 倒序阅读 0楼 发表于: 2009-10-10
http://k9jy.com/blog/2008/03/04/cw-skimmer-a-monster-or-killer-tool/

cw skimmer — a monster or killer tool?

while away in ireland, a technology busting new program from the makers of dx atlas showed up on the scene, creating responses of reluctant acceptance, to ham-bashing, to declarations that cw skills will no longer be required.

well, facts first.

cw skimmer is a "multi-channel cw decoder and analyzer." think of it as your psk waterfall screen for cw. it’s not the first cw decoder out there on the market; writelog has had a cw decoder for as long as i remember having the program, pulling out callsigns from the ether through your receiver’s passband.

but cw skimmer is a bit like writelog’s cw decoder on steroids. features, from the web site:

  * a very sensitive cw decoding algorithm based on the methods of bayesian statistics;
  * simultaneous decoding of all cw signals in the receiver passband – up to 700 signals can be decoded in parallel on a 3-ghz p4 if a wideband receiver is used;
  * a fast waterfall display, with a resolution sufficient for reading morse code dots and dashes visually;
  * the callsigns are extracted from the decoded messages, and the traces on the waterfall are labeled with stations’ callsigns;
  * a dsp processor with a noise blanker, agc, and a sharp, variable-bandwidth cw filter

and a picture is worth a thousand words; this from a 3-khz mode:

cw skimmer

this is a pretty interesting program. others have noted that, especially in the wideband mode, dxpeditions would have an easier time pulling out callsigns and contesters would too.

detractors lament the lack of skill needed in this endeavor for copying cw, but i don’t agree with that position. the mind is a great filter and i’ve done enough rtty contesting — where the machine decodes everything — to know that what is copied by a machine isn’t necessarily the right thing copied by a machine. the operator still counts.

yes, it could make cw different, just like calculators made doing long division different.

i think this sort of stuff is great for the hobby — it shows that we continue to embrace technology for communicating through radio waves. it will be interesting to see where this program takes the hobby.

i know i, for one, certainly don’t miss paper logs and dupe sheets…
离线BG4WCE
发帖
1079
只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2009-10-10
弄个cw decoder + cw coder,就真的不用学了。
离线bg2rje
发帖
295
只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2009-10-11
学还是要学的,人脑反应快。
上面字太多,没仔细看,这个软件系数台用,感觉非常好,操作员会很轻松。
离线bg2shq
发帖
131
只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2009-10-12
搜到鬼佬对skimmer的看法,比较客观。