Direct sampling SDR receiver measurements – IK1ODO, April 2008

图片:SDR_RX_measurements_页面_1.jpg

图片:SDR_RX_measurements_页面_2.jpg

注意这个是2008年的文字，那时的QS1R距现在的产品还差的很远，现在发售的是REVD

eHam上的评测

图片:1.gif

图片:2.gif

eHam上的评测

图片:3.gif

图片:4.gif

eHam上的评测

图片:5.gif

图片:6.gif

QS1R RF input modification

http://lea.hamradio.si/~s53ww/QS1r/qs1r.htm

So what SDR does everyone recommend? I would need full coverage from 0-30 mhz mainly for Shortwave Broadcast, Amateur SSB and some Utility listening. Just wanted to see what everyone else is using and how you like it. Price tag should be under $1000.

这里介绍的很好。值得一读。
http://forums.radioreference.com/software-defined-radio/236363-sdr-recommendation.html

蝌蚪，无视

BA7CK:蝌蚪，无视 (2013-10-30 19:10) 

能看明白，但翻译成文字还欠功夫

2009年/ IV3NWV的评测。

图片:1.gif

图片:2.gif

图片:3.gif

图片:4.gif

针对2009年IV3NWV评测的回应

     There is a document that was created in 2009 by the owner of Microtelecom SRL (the manufacturer of the Perseus receiver) titled “Perseus v. QS1R.pdf”. The document was created in response to the perceived threat of the QS1R to sales of the more expensive and inferior performing Perseus receiver. The author focused on one specification item where the Perseus was approximately 15 dB more sensitive than the QS1R to "prove" that the Perseus was superior to the QS1R Receiver. This document is extremely misleading and borders on being dishonest. Although its conclusions have been refuted and proven incorrect, I still receive questions about this document from perspective QS1R owners and therefor I will address the issues with this document here.

     The testing was performed on an early QS1R unit without enclosure borrowed from a QS1R owner who had admittedly damaged the unit. Evidence that the unit was in fact damaged is the report of the MDS of the QS1R being degraded severely when the Dither function was turned on. This is an indication that the input network components of the QS1R was damaged. Under normal operation the QS1R sensitivity degrades by approximately 1 dB when the Dither function is used.

    I have asked for the testing and results in the PDF document to be re-performed and reported with a undamaged QS1R, but to date ( Nov. 2011) these tests and report have not been updated. I will leave it to the reader to decide why this is so.
    The document incorrectly states that the QS1R is not CE and FCC certified.
    The document incorrectly states that the QS1R does not have wide band record and playback.
    The document incorrectly states that the QS1R SSB and CW MDS is -104/-111 dBm.
    The document incorrectly states that the QS1R Sensitivity is 4.2 uV.
    The document incorrectly calculates the BDR figures for the QS1R based on the above incorrect test data.
    The author's claim that the Perseus is approximately 15 dB more sensitive than the QS1R is correct, however this excess sensitivity goes to waste over more than half of the Perseus's operating range and decreases the ADC clipping level by the same 15 dB. Please see the discussion below:

官方发布的性能参数

图片:5.jpg

噪声指标

图片:ManMadeNoise.jpg

洋文不是明白

图片:7.gif

路总在防毒！

站长是倒打一耙

HDSDR似乎比SDRMAX省点资源。

图片:8.gif

图片:9.gif

参照站长的帖子http://www.hellocq.net/forum/read.php?tid=310327

QS1R的3rd order intercept 超过42dbm，而590在20K和2K时的3rd order intercept 只是26和22dbm

倒是该注意一下FT5000和Perseus SDR的指标。

图片:13_2748_a95bfa051f04870.jpg

如同大多数人评价的那样，QS1R直采取样，输入动态范围很大，甚至可以在TX时直接观测自己的频谱，但0.56μV的限噪灵敏度似乎有点欠缺，因此建议加一个PreAMP，但是，这两者是否又是鱼与熊掌的关系呢？

有待验证。